https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318425 --- Comment #26 from Tom.Rix@xxxxxxx --- (In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #25) > Package seems to be exclude arched, although it AFAIK should build fine and > with basic functions(BLAS/CPU backend) present on all architectures. If > there are any serious reasons could you please open tracking issues per > architecture support guidelines > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > #_architecture_support after this bug concludes. > > I'm looking at it atm and it seems as rather small changes to spec should > enable all of it(conditional dependency on rocm, proper archstring in file > paths etc.) I do not have any other the arch hw so i have now way to test or support it. If you want to provide a patch for an arch you want, please send a pr. package has been added to the go-sig (iirc), so anyone in it should be able to enhance this package as needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318425 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202318425%23c26 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
