https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318425 Jakub Čajka <jcajka@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jcajka@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #25 from Jakub Čajka <jcajka@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package seems to be exclude arched, although it AFAIK should build fine and with basic functions(BLAS/CPU backend) present on all architectures. If there are any serious reasons could you please open tracking issues per architecture support guidelines https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_support after this bug concludes. I'm looking at it atm and it seems as rather small changes to spec should enable all of it(conditional dependency on rocm, proper archstring in file paths etc.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318425 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202318425%23c25 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
