[Bug 2337050] Review Request: libspeechprovider - Provider of speech-related functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337050

Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #15 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Steve Cossette from comment #8)
> Unless I'm completely misunderstanding, or I'm using the wrong words here,
> if a library ends in .so, it's usually a development library. If it has a
> number after, then it's an installable library. I might be wrong, I guess?

That's true for libraries that applications are expected to link to at build
time (which is most libraries).

For plugins that are expected to be dynamically loaded at runtime, then it's
normal to have no versioning, but such plugins should not be installed directly
into a linker search path to ensure they are not linked to by mistake.

So any library ending in .so *usually* goes in the -devel package and therefore
does not get installed. But not always (if it's a plugin installed into a
custom location).

In this case, yes the unversioned library should be a symlink and it belongs in
a -devel subpackage.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337050

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202337050%23c15

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux