https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337087 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> --- LGTM so here is my formal Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. Note: python3-pytest7 is deprecated, you must not depend on it. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/deprecating-packages/ ^^^ false positive. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv3 or later). [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package owns all directories that it creates. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package does not contain desktop file (not a GUI application). [-]: No need for a separate -devel package. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: The package is not a rename of another package. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package does not contain systemd file(s). [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: No extra large documentation files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: No python eggs. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: I did not test if the package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged (3.5). [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: No extra patches. [?]: I did not test if the package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-pass-import-3.5-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python3-pass-import+xml-3.5-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python3-pass-import+keepass-3.5-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring-3.5-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp-3.5-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python3-pass-import+decrypt-3.5-1.fc42.noarch.rpm python-pass-import-3.5-1.fc42.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpcodq7aai')] checks: 32, packages: 7 python3-pass-import+decrypt.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+keepass.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+xml.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') ^^^ false positive. python3-pass-import.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/pass-import ^^^ can be safely ignored. python3-pass-import+decrypt.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+keepass.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+xml.noarch: W: no-documentation ^^^ this is intentional 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 6 warnings, 119 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 1.1 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 6 python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+keepass.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+xml.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import+decrypt.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Metapackage', 'Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage') python3-pass-import.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/pass-import python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+keepass.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+xml.noarch: W: no-documentation python3-pass-import+decrypt.noarch: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 6 warnings, 112 filtered, 5 badness; has taken 0.6 s Source checksums ---------------- https://pujol.io/keys/0xc5469996f0df68ec.asc : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7f2a5cea6a02090f7706b2f78086d29659b19d64931494ca329b0914d6ba8e97 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7f2a5cea6a02090f7706b2f78086d29659b19d64931494ca329b0914d6ba8e97 https://github.com/roddhjav/pass-import/releases/download/v3.5/pass-import-3.5.tar.gz.asc : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ad020dd2dd804324565fa51fd94cb05dacd734c43201722e7bb7289b90243a00 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ad020dd2dd804324565fa51fd94cb05dacd734c43201722e7bb7289b90243a00 https://github.com/roddhjav/pass-import/releases/download/v3.5/pass-import-3.5.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : fb0adf7f73b13e4006bb5327e0a97428de059af2006fe32768445c0f949c0cd7 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fb0adf7f73b13e4006bb5327e0a97428de059af2006fe32768445c0f949c0cd7 Requires -------- python3-pass-import (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/bash /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3.13dist(pyaml) python3.13dist(requests) python3.13dist(zxcvbn) python3-pass-import+xml (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-pass-import python3.13dist(defusedxml) python3-pass-import+keepass (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-pass-import python3.13dist(pykeepass) python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-pass-import python3.13dist(secretstorage) python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-pass-import python3.13dist(cryptography) python3-pass-import+decrypt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-pass-import python3.13dist(file-magic) Provides -------- python3-pass-import: python-pass-import python3-pass-import python3.13-pass-import python3.13dist(pass-import) python3dist(pass-import) python3-pass-import+xml: python-pass-import+xml python3-pass-import+xml python3.13-pass-import+xml python3.13dist(pass-import[xml]) python3dist(pass-import[xml]) python3-pass-import+keepass: python-pass-import+keepass python3-pass-import+keepass python3.13-pass-import+keepass python3.13dist(pass-import[keepass]) python3dist(pass-import[keepass]) python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring: python-pass-import+gnomekeyring python3-pass-import+gnomekeyring python3.13-pass-import+gnomekeyring python3.13dist(pass-import[gnomekeyring]) python3dist(pass-import[gnomekeyring]) python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp: python-pass-import+encrypted_otp python3-pass-import+encrypted_otp python3.13-pass-import+encrypted_otp python3.13dist(pass-import[encrypted_otp]) python3dist(pass-import[encrypted_otp]) python3-pass-import+decrypt: python-pass-import+decrypt python3-pass-import+decrypt python3.13-pass-import+decrypt python3.13dist(pass-import[decrypt]) python3dist(pass-import[decrypt]) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2337087 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: Perl, Ocaml, SugarActivity, fonts, R, PHP, Haskell, Java, C/C++ Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH I don't see any issues so this package is ================ === APPROVED === ================ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337087 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202337087%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
