[Bug 2334082] Review Request: rocjpeg - A high-performance jpeg decode library for AMD’s GPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334082



--- Comment #3 from Tom.Rix@xxxxxxx ---
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/rocjpeg.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/rocjpeg-6.3.1-1.fc42.src.rpm

I cleaned up the comments and fixed the whitespace issue in the spec file.

The problems with rocdecode are also the problems with rocjpeg because upstream
projects' cmakes are nearly identical, differing only by use of rocDecode vs
rocJPEG.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334082

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202334082%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux