https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334841 --- Comment #6 from me@xxxxxxxxxxx --- 0. Oops xD 1. Yeah I was mostly trying to placate fedora-review-service. I suspected something like what you're saying, but couldn't see the compiler dep when I went looking at the rust package. Guess I just didn't look carefully enough ;) I'll remove this unnecessary dep in the next revision. 2. Interesting, guess I didn't run into the inconsistency because I've only been building against aarch64/x64 in COPR 3. Ah, right. Oops! I'll add a rust2rpm.toml per your suggestion and fix this up, thanks. 4. I see, I'll do that in the next revision. Interestingly I've already done this in some local changes that build rust-libphosh-sys 0.0.5, but I can't submit that yet because libphosh 0.44 hasn't made its way into the repos. I'll push up a new revision soon, thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334841 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202334841%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
