https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321925 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Junghans <junghans@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tom.Rix from comment #8) > If you want, you can add me as at least a contributor to the package and/or > poke me or file a bz and assign to me to add the magma and rocfft bits once > it lands. > I'd like to see both used as widely as possible. > Then we can add it to the rocm sig's copr here > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/rocm-packagers-sig/RH/ > To make sure it does not break with rocm or magma updates. Sound like a plan, let's get the base non-rocm version in and then we can iterate on the rocm part. lammps and gromacs can use heffte, so that would give us two consumers already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321925 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202321925%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
