Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey@xxxxxxxx 2008-02-01 04:58 EST ------- Ok, this is exactly what I suspected: tried to change the README file delivered by tunables-base-data, and here's the result I got: <snip> D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Name create mode=0x42 D: read h# 913 Header SHA1 digest: OK (4c878e96685b21513e679f21dc15cc800d901239) D: read h# 917 Header SHA1 digest: OK (16ffc11b812ff117879d896cc00e7e5ac100d998) D: computing 5 file fingerprints Preparing... D: computing file dispositions D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames create mode=0x42 ########################################### [100%] package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 is already installed file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-4.fc8 file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: May free Score board((nil)) [root@akt i386]# echo $? 1 So sounds like it is normal to be able to install a newer version over an older one without conflicts problems, given that the common files have the same contents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review