[Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028


notting@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |notting@xxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From notting@xxxxxxxxxx  2008-01-31 15:08 EST -------
MUST:
 - Package meets naming guidelines - OK
 - Spec file matches base package name. - OK
 - Spec has consistant macro usage. - ***
 - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
 - License - GPLv2+ - OK
 - License field in spec matches - OK
 - License file included in package - ***
 - Spec in American English - OK
 - Spec is legible. - OK
 - Sources match upstream md5sum:
794208083d405ece123ad59a02f3e233 - OK
 - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
 - BuildRequires correct - OK
 - Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK
 - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
 - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
 - Package has correct buildroot - OK
 - Package is code or permissible content. - OK
 - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
 - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK, once they're added

 - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A, nuked
 - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - OK
 - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A
 - .la files are removed. - OK

 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - once issue #1 addressed,
yes (tested x86_64)
 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
 - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
 - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
 - No rpmlint output.
upstart.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/event.d/logd

This may be OK, if this isn't meant to be user modified.

 - final provides and requires are sane: ***

SHOULD Items:

 - Should build in mock. - OK (tested x86_64)
 - Should build on all supported archs - didn't test ppc
 - Should function as described. - ***
 - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A
 - Should have dist tag - OK
 - Should package latest version - OK

Issues:
1) %configure --enable-compat=sysv --sbindir=/sbin --libdir=/lib

Needs to be --libdir=/%{_lib}, otherwise build will fail on x86_64, ppc64.

2) No docs, including licenses

Probably should include ChangeLog, AUTHORS, COPYING, NEWS, README, TODO, HACKING

3) Should this package require event-compat-sysv? Should it obsolete/provide
sysvinit?

4) Re: functionality. I think that will go in a separate bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]