https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751 --- Comment #30 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > Is the perfetto-libs subpackage useful even without the main package files? It seems like it should be. Yes, it provides the shared library that things using perfetto can leverage. > Currently not using tmpfiles.d. Should we be? We actually are using tmpfiles.d already :) > Should the SDK be noarch? Seems so. The SDK has a Requires on the -libs subpackage which is arched, so it cannot be noarch or we'd end up with FTIs. > I also recommend we use the https://github.com/google/perfetto repo as the source because it's easier to see what is going on, etc. The Google source control system is ... very Googly. Both are fine so this is just a preference. I generally prefer to avoid mirrors if possible as they tend to get out of date / diverge and that can be painful to reconcile down the road. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255751 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255751%23c30 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
