[Bug 2307912] Review Request: python-pyliblo3 - Python bindings for the liblo Open Sound Control (OSC) library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307912

Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RELEASE_PENDING             |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #37 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Obsoletes:      python3-pyliblo < 0.10.0-30

This needs to be moved in the python3-pyliblo3 subpackage, otherwise it does
nothing (assuming you follow the other steps bellow).



> %package -n     python3-%{modname}
> Summary:        %{summary}

The %{summary} expands to the previous Summary in the specfile, hence
"Documentation for python-pyliblo3". Either move the doc subpackage after the
python3-pyliblo3 subpackage or avoid using %{summary} here.

> Recommends:     python3-pyliblo3

This is self-referencing Recommends. What is the idea behind it?




> %files -n python-pyliblo3 -f %{pyproject_files}

This needs to be python3-pyliblo3, not python-pyliblo3. Currently, the
python3-pyliblo3 package is not generated because it has no %files section.
Instead, the python-pyliblo3 package is generated which we don't want.

----

> There is a constant debate if macros like `modname` are necessary or not, just be consistent in the usage.

Exactly, the specfile has 3 uses of %{modname} and 16 uses of pyliblo3
(excluding the %changelog entries). Pick one, and stick with it. My opinion is
that using %{modname} only makes the specfile harder to read and maintain.



---

Once again I'd like to point out the example Python specfile in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_example_spec_file
which should give you the general idea about the package structure.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307912

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202307912%23c37

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux