[Bug 2313902] Review Request: rocdecode - High-performance video decode SDK for AMD GPUs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2313902

Tom.Rix@xxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(alexjnewt@fastmai
                   |                            |l.com)
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #3 from Tom.Rix@xxxxxxx ---
No gcc is fine, the checker is not smart enough to figure out dependencies of
hip's cc.

The SPDX check is nagging about 'and' it prefers 'AND'
What files were BSD?

The license file is not boilerplate MIT, can you include the non MIT part under
the %license field ?
This part:
NOTICE REGARDING STANDARDS                                                      

AMD does not provide a license or sublicense to any Intellectual Property
Rights                                                         
relating to any standards, including but not limited to any audio and/or video  
codec technologies such as MPEG-2, MPEG-4; AVC/H.264; HEVC/H.265; AAC
decode/FFMPEG;                                                     
AAC encode/FFMPEG; VC-1; and MP3 (collectively, the “Media Technologies”).      
For clarity, you will pay any royalties due for such third party technologies,  
which may include the Media Technologies that are owed as a result of           
AMD providing the Software to you.

For the patch to deal with llvm/bin/clang++, could this be done with a sed line
in %prep ?

Other rocm packages have --with debug and --with test options.
Please add these and if they are not mockable, note why. ex/ downloads stuff..

I like the idea of having samples, but they need to work, these do not.
If it is too much effort to get them in shape, drop including them.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2313902

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202313902%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux