[Bug 2305882] Review Request: papers - View multipage documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882



--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> WRT the source tarball, I wonder if you were using a manually generated git snapshot, or if they repushed the tarball upstream?  Either way, that seems to be fixed in your latest SRPM.

No, it's the exact same tarball that's in both papers-47~beta-1.fc42.src.rpm
and papers-47~beta-2.fc42.src.rpm, and matches the upstream tarball. I just
double checked all the links above and it's the same tarball in all cases, so I
strongly suspect it's something that was wrong on your end - but I'm glad it
seems fixed now.


> 1) The mjw locale has no directory ownership.  AFAICS the reason is that locale is in ISO-639-3 but not in -2.  Please file a bug on filesystem to fix that.

Sure, here you go: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311691


> 2) The /usr/share/help/$LOCALE directories have no ownership.  filesystem provides /usr/share/help but no subdirectories.  Please file another bug on filesystem to fix that.

There's already https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281584 for this.


> 3) evince-libs is still needed for some packages (e.g. sushi), but should/will there be an automatic upgrade path for evince->papers and the same for -previewer (probably depends on gtk3/4 being updated) and -thumbnailer (it seems silly to have both)?  (In such a case, evince itself should no longer require those subpackages.)

There are all good questions, and we'll need to figure out how to do all this
as soon as Workstation wants to switch from evince to papers. For now however
it's just a new package that is not going to be installed by default and I
don't think it makes sense to add any kind of automatic upgrade path handling.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202305882%23c9

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux