needinfo canceled: [Bug 1853888] Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review

Lewis <anesa.lewis@xxxxxxxxx> has canceled Package Review
<package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'s request for Lewis
<anesa.lewis@xxxxxxxxx>'s needinfo:
Bug 1853888: Review Request: libLTK - Ladspa v3 ToolKit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853888



--- Comment #23 from Lewis <anesa.lewis@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I got back to the project since March.

I'm building a website for hosting libLTK and everything that comes from it.

Last review raised :
Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.

Package named libLTK as it mainly installs libLTK.so .

I take for example https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libcbor
which is named libcbor and provides libcbor.so .

Should I rename package? lower case?
Should I share some API naming policy to be sure having best practise?

In past 4 years libLTK did not changed a lot and serves as a base for
extensions libraries.

Best regards, Lewis ANESA.

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux