https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303167 --- Comment #4 from Igor Raits <igor.raits@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Only Apache-2.0 is addressed. I think we need to add the non-generated licenses and license files. I don't think so / not sure. The only things that are there with different than Apache-2.0 license are: bison-generated files (conffile…) ``` /* As a special exception, you may create a larger work that contains part or all of the Bison parser skeleton and distribute that work under terms of your choice, so long as that work isn't itself a parser generator using the skeleton or a modified version thereof as a parser skeleton. Alternatively, if you modify or redistribute the parser skeleton itself, you may (at your option) remove this special exception, which will cause the skeleton and the resulting Bison output files to be licensed under the GNU General Public License without this special exception. This special exception was added by the Free Software Foundation in version 2.2 of Bison. */ ``` md5: as this is public domain / kind of I am not sure if this needs to be specified there. > Check is disabled and the referenced issue has been resolved. Please enable tests again and open a new issue if there are still actually issues. The issue is still there, exactly the same. I will send it to upstream after import. I think this is not that critical for now. > carbon-c-relay.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/carbon-c-relay SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list This is expected because user can configure their ciphers if they wish in the config. ``` listen type linemode [transport <plain | gzip | lz4 | snappy> [<ssl | mtls> <pemcert> [protomin <tlsproto>] [protomax <tlsproto>] [ciphers <ssl-ciphers>] [ciphersuites <tls-suite>] ] ] <<interface[:port] | port> proto <udp | tcp>> ... </ptah/to/file proto unix> ... ; # tlsproto: <ssl3 | tls1.0 | tls1.1 | tls1.2 | tls1.3> # ssl-ciphers: see ciphers(1) # tls-suite: see SSL_CTX_set_ciphersuites(3) ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303167 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202303167%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
