[Bug 2299981] Review Request: vyper - Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299981



--- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Just a few minor items, most of which are nonblocking for this review:
> 
> - There is no point in passing the -t flag to %pyproject_buildrequires if
> the tests cannot be run anyway

Done. I'll return it back as soon as all builddeps required for testing will be
available.

> - If you don't need this package on i386, it would be nice to add
>   "ExcludeArch: %{ix86}".  See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval

I do not need it on i386 but the package is noarch anyway so I'd rather not add
an extra line to a spec-file.

> - Under "SHOULD items" below, "Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists
> or are otherwise justified" has not been done.

All these three packages are Fedora-specific. I'll explain:

* Patch1:         vyper-0001-Use-Cryptodomex.patch

^^^ We package Cryptodomex with Cryptodome prefix. I'll try to propose upstream
a compatible solution.

* Patch2:         vyper-0002-Ease-version-requirements.patch

^^^ Fedora sometimes has too modern libraries versions and upstream is too
conservative to consider relaxing requirements.

* Patch3:        
vyper-0003-Lark-should-go-to-the-main-install-section-as-it-use.patch

^^^ This was rejected by upstream and necessary only for
%pyproject_check_import passing.

> - Please see the non-executable-script warning below.  Should that file be
> executable?

Done. 

The same links:

Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/vyper.spec
SRPM URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/vyper-0.4.0-1.fc40.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299981

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202299981%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux