[Bug 2295820] Review Request: hipblaslt - ROCm general matrix operations beyond BLAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820

Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
So some more information from a ROCm developer, we were in a meeting that
included Tom and me:

The bundled tensile is a fork, and is expected to diverge from tensile (if it
hasn't already) and become a replacement for tensile in rocm (other libs are
supposed to eventually call rocblaslt).
I'd rather just move forward, and we can drop tensile later if need be.

> How do we handle the "bundled" tensile ... I don't think that it needs to be added to the provides but I also don't know if there is anything preventing this from happening

A bundle is a bundle, you need to add it regardless. The provides is more of a
flag. I believe the intention is if they a security issue or similar critical
issue in the library, the maintainer can look for the provides to notify the
other maintainer that there's a critical bug that needs fixing. This could also
be a CVE, a license issue, a copyright issue, a legal issue, etc. Providing a
version is pretty important too for tracking.

E.g. say library A has a CVE and package B bundles A, then it's easy to query
for "provides: A" to see what packages need updating, which would be A and B.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux