https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296168 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- In this case, the upstream project provides license files, they're just not included in the published crate. So including them manually from GitHub is fine for now. The bigger problem for me is that the published crate doesn't match the state of the repo. But having the maintainer push their local-only changes should be an easier thing to accomplish ("git push") than poking them with a PR about licenses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296168 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202296168%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
