[Bug 2293272] Review Request: gcc13 - GCC 13 compatibility compiler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293272



--- Comment #13 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Spec URL:
> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/n1rn31tfvhsmqj4yp57qr/compat-gcc.
> spec?rlkey=y2ro4skiod232cagmexo5ca2l&st=02cswqoa&dl=0
> SRPM URL:
> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rxeagrp5277dvgmi7wxzd/compat-gcc-13.3.1-2.1.
> fc40.src.rpm?rlkey=2upxn8ft9a190u1f2r8rmoors&st=26rv3vzm&dl=0
> Description: For the AI packages we're trying to find a solution because
> NVIDIA CUDA relies on understanding all the new GCC features and extensions,
> but lags at least half a year behind, so the idea is to ship
> in Fedora compat-gcc package which will be one GCC major older than that to
> be usable in case the system gcc is too new for CUDA.  As long as there are
> no changes to SONAMEs of the libraries, during
> dynamic linking the packages just use the system gcc libraries, just during
> linking with gcc-13 or g++-13 etc. restrict to the set of symbols from the
> older gcc.  Some features are intentionally removed
> from the compatibility compiler, it only supports C/C++/Fortran, not
> ObjC/ObjC++/D/Go/Ada/Modula2, the Graphite optimizations or OpenMP/OpenACC
> offloading aren't supported either.
> To avoid doing new package process each year, the src.rpm is unversioned,
> while the binary packages are versioned and will eventually contain needed
> Obsoletes.
> Fedora Account System Username: jakub
> 
> Earlier scratch build is in 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/jakub/task_118872650/

@jakub this is not exactly the proper format of the review, the closest you got
is in this comment, but the description is not the reasoning behind the package
but the actual %description of the package.

Anyway, as discussed I'm taking the review.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293272

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202293272%23c13

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux