https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283055 --- Comment #43 from Attila Kovacs <attipaci@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #42) Thanks Daniel -- both for sponsoring and for the good comments, Yes, the 1.0.1-2 tag is a bit special (created to make it more friendly for packaging) -- but API-wise it's still just 1.0.1 really, so I'll keep it as such in the .spec. It will be all straightened out in the next upstream release in due in September. (It may be 1.0.2 or 1.1.0 -- I'll see depending on what goes into it...) I have added the CIO_LOCATOR_FILE to the make command line, as you suggested. Good catch, thanks! I'm now running a test build on Copr with the latest spec. If it looks good, I'll submit the spec and SRPM links below... cheers, -- A. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283055 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283055%23c43 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
