https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283055 --- Comment #42 from Daniel Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #40) > > %build > > > > # Define where the library will look for the CIO locator data > > CIO_LOCATOR_FILE=%{_datadir}/%{name}/cio_ra.bin > > You installed the cio_ra.bin to %{_libdir}, so I would presume this > CIO_LOCATOR_FILE path needs to match that, as IIUC, this env variable is > used to set the path compiled into the resulting library. Actually in the build log we can see this env var is currently having no effect: + CIO_LOCATOR_FILE=/usr/share/supernovas/cio_ra.bin + make -j20 distro WARNING! No default CIO_LOCATOR_FILE defined. . Will use local 'cio_ra.bin' if present. I think you need to pass it as a make variable instead to have it honoured: eg make %{?_smp_mflags} distro CIO_LOCATOR_FILE=%{_datadir}/%{name}/cio_ra.bin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283055 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283055%23c42 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
