[Bug 2279333] Review Request: elementary-greeter - LightDM Login Screen for the elementary desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333



--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> Is there a specific reason for using the “traditional” snapshot versioning style
> rather than the current style?

Two "minor" reasons:
I find the "old" snapshot versioning style without rpmautospec easier to get
right.
It's also consistent with other elementary project snapshots that I'm working
on right now.

> %{commitdate}.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist} is <date>.<scm><revision>, which doesn’t exactly match any of these formats.

Correct. Though IMO it's an oversight that this is not a documented format. I
find 20240513.gitabc4567 much more readable than 20240513gitabc4567 (and I'm
pretty sure only the one *with* the dot sorts correctly wrt/ RPM sorting, in
the rare cases where this matters).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279333%23c4
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux