https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276290 --- Comment #4 from wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3) > Yes, but custom allocators are, by definition, optional. > We already have a handful of packages in Fedora that drop custom allocators > because they are painful to deal with. If I can workaround I would. I'll try to investigate further. In the meantime, could you link a package that deals (drops?) with custom allocators? > > Couldn't we just remove the noarch line and limit valid architectures with > > ExclusiveArch similarly to > > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/nvidia-340xx-kmod.git/tree/nvidia- > > 340xx-kmod.spec#n34 > > ? > > No, that would be wrong. > > The correct solution would be to use the "supported-arches" setting in > rust2rpm.toml to specify that the crate should only be built and tested on > certain architectures. Ok. I've updated the spec file to use supported-arches from rust2rpm.toml. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276290 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202276290%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
