https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276290 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to wojnilowicz from comment #2) > I try to package this aw-server-rust and it has this as a dependency for > Linux and x86 as seen at > https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-server-rust/blob/ > c056e50646b45070c330de8a6dbd14042b3455e4/aw-server/Cargo.toml#L40 Yes, but custom allocators are, by definition, optional. We already have a handful of packages in Fedora that drop custom allocators because they are painful to deal with. > Couldn't we just remove the noarch line and limit valid architectures with > ExclusiveArch similarly to > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/nvidia-340xx-kmod.git/tree/nvidia- > 340xx-kmod.spec#n34 > ? No, that would be wrong. The correct solution would be to use the "supported-arches" setting in rust2rpm.toml to specify that the crate should only be built and tested on certain architectures. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276290 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202276290%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
