[Bug 2255842] Review Request: psmoveapi - Library for 6DoF tracking of the PS Move Motion Controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255842



--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Here is the first pass as what I spotted.

[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-Clause License", "*No copyright*
     MIT License", "BSD 2-Clause License [generated file]", "*No copyright*
     GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later", "GNU General Public
     License, Version 3", "BSD 3-Clause License". 60 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/jon/rpmbuild/reviews/psmoveapi/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

BSD-2-Clause is the only listed and installed license.

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/pkgconfig, /usr/lib/udev,
     /usr/lib/udev/rules.d
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/udev,
     /usr/lib/udev/rules.d

pkgconf-pkg-config
systemd-udev

[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
  Note: libusb-compat-0.1 is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/deprecating-packages/

This one might be required if upstream doesn't support a newer libusb. I'm not
sure what the policy is here.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255842

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255842%23c4
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux