[Bug 2274028] Review Request: rust-vhost-device-sound - Vhost-user SOUND backend device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274028

blinxen <h-k-81@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |h-k-81@xxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from blinxen <h-k-81@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I took a quick peek and have the following comments:

* Both patches ("ignore-pw-server-test.patch" and
"build-fix-for-alsa-test.patch") simply add the `ignore` attribute to some
tests.
  Therefore I see them as redundant and would just skip them in the `%check`
section like you did with `result::tests::async_seq_panic`.
* The patch for `i386` should be called "build-fix-for-i686", since this is
what we actually build in Fedora.
  `i386` is only used in copr.
* Is the `i386` patch forwarded to upstream? I think it might be useful to them
too.
* Why do all packages have "BuildArch: noarch"?
* The man page should not be added by using a patch. Use `Source` and copy the
man page in the `%install` section. Also this can / should be forwarded to
upstream.
* The comment "# FIXME: paste output of %%cargo_license_summary here" should be
removed since you wrote down the output of `%cargo_license_summary`.
* Please add the output of "%cargo_license_summary" as a comment in the spec
file above `License`. We do this for all Rust packages and it makes it easier
to double check the license tags.
* Is there a specific reason for including the binary file and the man page in
the devel subpackage? I think this was added by mistake since the binary
package does not contain the man page.

> I think there's some packaging issue with devel packages for the backends. I see for example:
> I would have expected different content there.

The output looks correct to me. What content would you have expected?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274028

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202274028%23c2
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux