https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267321 --- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #14) > Maybe missing an explicit BR: make rather than relying on deps ? Good point, will add when importing. > Otherwise looks good, will try and do a full review asap. Thanks! (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #17) > Could you please take a look at the following rpmlint warnings ? > librtmp.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-gnutls-2 > /usr/lib64/librtmp.so.1 gnutls_priority_init > librtmp.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-gnutls-1 > /usr/lib64/librtmp.so.1 gnutls_priority_set_direct > > See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/ > > And also : > librtmp.x86_64: W: binary-or-shlib-calls-gethostbyname > /usr/lib64/librtmp.so.1 > > Both shall probably at least be notified to upstream. They are valid and I sent them upstream. However, I wonder if RTMP even supports IPv6 or if there are specific old crypto requirements at work here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267321 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202267321%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
