[Bug 2255828] Review Request: llama-cpp - Port of Facebook's LLaMA model in C/C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255828

Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #12 from Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Agreed with Sergey about the CLI tools: there is many of them, especially
"main", "quantize" and "server" that would be really helpful to have. These
tools have generic names which is unfortunate in context of the whole operating
system. We should prefix them with something like llama.cpp-main,
llama.cpp-quantize, etc.

I wonder how supported these binaries are because all their sources live in
examples/ dir: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/tree/master/examples


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255828

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202255828%23c12
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux