https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268679 José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review+ CC| |jamatos@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> --- Hi Sandro, is there a reason to be using the development version and not the stable release? Is that due to the test issue that you identified above. Because that is only reason where fedora-review rightly complains: - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. The difference is related with changes introduced upstream, while your original package used a previous commit. The patch is not applied because it is already applied upstream. Other than that this is a simple python package. The licenses are correct and admissible on Fedora and the package follows the Fedora package guidelines for Python packages. Please fix the source issue on import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268679 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202268679%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
