[Bug 2252229] Review Request: sandia-omega-h - Reliable mesh adaptation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229



--- Comment #17 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #16)
> Issues:
> =======
> 
> - I don't think %ldconfig_scriptlets is required any more. The guidelines
> now say: "It is not necessary to call ldconfig when installing shared
> libraries."
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_shared_libraries

I dropped it. I can't remember where I picked that up.

> - Licenses may need a look

I ran scancode on the src/ and tpl/ dirs and updated the Licens field
accordingly.

> - may need to look at whether it bundles Random123/pss (and other things?)

Good catch. Random123 was bundled. I'm now using the system Random123. In pss/
there's only two header files, both with an acceptable license. Apparently pss
is an acronym for parallel stable sort. I couldn't find a suitable package in
the repos.

I think it's okay leaving it in. Not sure if I need to add a provides bundled.

> - the -{openmpi,mpich}-devel sub packages should probably also Require:
> {openmpich/mpich}-devel I think, since they'll be required for development?

Why? I haven't seen that done in any of the MPI packages I've touched so far.

> - any reason we're not building the tests for the standard build? (but there
> are still some default tests that are run in %check)

No reason. Just an oversight. It's enabled now for all builds.

> - we could generate man pages for the binaries

I included generated man pages now for the binaries of the standard package
where it makes (kind of) sense. Unfortunately, most of the binaries do not
implement `--help` throwing errors regarding missing or unknown arguments. Some
even dump core.

I'm not sure it makes sense at all. But I left it in for now so you can see for
yourself.

Spec URL: https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/sandia-omega-h.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/sandia-omega-h-9.34.13-2.fc41.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202252229%23c17
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux