[Bug 2252229] Review Request: sandia-omega-h - Reliable mesh adaptation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229



--- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> ---
>From the STEPS files, it looks like upstream uses version 9.34.13, which is the
latest tag in the omega-h repo:
https://github.com/sanjayankur31/STEPS/blob/11380f78cf2110a55d6694ac1e8a6929ae7b69f0/CMake/BundleOmega_h.cmake#L14

But they do say "an external omega-h may be used" in the readme, so it doesn't
suggest a hard version dependency? While packaging it anyway, we need to
package the latest version. So, either we make an assumption and use the one
the latest tag (v9x), or we ask on the repo for clarification. (I'm personally
inclined to go with the v9 series because they seem to be actively developed)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202252229%23c14
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux