https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229 --- Comment #14 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- >From the STEPS files, it looks like upstream uses version 9.34.13, which is the latest tag in the omega-h repo: https://github.com/sanjayankur31/STEPS/blob/11380f78cf2110a55d6694ac1e8a6929ae7b69f0/CMake/BundleOmega_h.cmake#L14 But they do say "an external omega-h may be used" in the readme, so it doesn't suggest a hard version dependency? While packaging it anyway, we need to package the latest version. So, either we make an assumption and use the one the latest tag (v9x), or we ask on the repo for clarification. (I'm personally inclined to go with the v9 series because they seem to be actively developed) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202252229%23c14 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue