[Bug 2252229] Review Request: sandia-omega-h - Reliable mesh adaptation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229



--- Comment #13 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #11)
> Getting a mock build failure here, unfortunately:

I suspect that's due to changes that have now landed in rawhide / f40. It did
build before in Copr. I will look into it and provide an update.

(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #12)
> I'm also a bit confused about upstream's versioning.
> 
> https://github.com/sandialabs/omega_h/tags 
> 
> v10.1.0 is the highest tag, but not the latest. v9.x is the latest one. The
> `main` branch is also on v9.x, and so is `develop`. I see no other v10.x
> releases either.
> 
> 🤔

It looks like v10.1.0 tag was an accident, indeed and I should probably use the
most recent tag instead? It doesn't help that there are no official releases
anywhere. Not even on Sandia's website:
https://www.sandia.gov/ccr/software/omega-h/

I can think of two options:

1) Ask upstream what they consider the latest version and what happened to
v10.1.0.
2) Ask STEPS folks which version they are using and package that. This might
also be deducible from the STEPS sources.

If it turns out v10.1.0 was an accident and is thus not the latest version,
would that require any additional steps to get this package approved?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2252229

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202252229%23c13
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux