[Bug 2208398] Review Request: python-pyasn - Offline IP address to Autonomous System Number lookup module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208398

Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |POST
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #11 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #10)
> (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #7)
> > The primary problem is there is no %license in %files section. %ľicense
> > LICENSE is missing. No file is installed into /usr/share/licenses/ and that
> > is not optional. That have not changed after comment #5 update.
> 
> This is already taken care of by the %pyproject_save_files macro (see the
> README at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros for
> details). You can confirm that the license file is being included and
> correctly marked as %license with:
> 

This is what I got after fedpkg --release rawhide local done on comment #5 spec
file:

$ rpm -qpl x86_64/python3-pyasn-1.6.1-2.fc41.x86_64.rpm 
/usr/bin/pyasn_util_asnames.py
/usr/bin/pyasn_util_convert.py
/usr/bin/pyasn_util_download.py
/usr/lib/.build-id
/usr/lib/.build-id/c3
/usr/lib/.build-id/c3/afbbb4e40c81f2a8e6a284fbebe091f13b5ddf
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/INSTALLER
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/LICENSE
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/METADATA
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/WHEEL
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/top_level.txt
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__init__.py
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-311.opt-1.pyc
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-311.pyc
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__/_version.cpython-311.opt-1.pyc
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__/_version.cpython-311.pyc
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__/mrtx.cpython-311.opt-1.pyc
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/__pycache__/mrtx.cpython-311.pyc
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/_version.py
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/mrtx.py
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn/pyasn_radix.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
/usr/share/doc/python3-pyasn
/usr/share/doc/python3-pyasn/BACKLOG.txt
/usr/share/doc/python3-pyasn/README.md

$ rpm -qp x86_64/python3-pyasn-1.6.1-2.fc41.x86_64.rpm -L
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyasn-1.6.1.dist-info/LICENSE

Okay, this is quite unexpected to me. I have expected license files would land
always into /usr/share/licenses/python3-pyasn, like for other packages. But
since the license file is correctly marked as a license file and is optional,
then everything needed for successful review is present.

I think I would fill a request to put at least symlink into
/usr/share/licenses, so it is easier to find the actual license text. I have
never had to use rpm -q --licensefiles until now, I expect I would not be the
only one surprised.

Anyway, review passed. Please continue with importing the package!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2208398

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202208398%23c11
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux