[Bug 2261201] Review Request: miopen - AMD's Machine Intelligence Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261201



--- Comment #5 from Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/miopen.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/miopen-6.0.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

Most of the issues are addressed.

The db's.  I am not sure what you saying. can we not use a db as-is ?

For patch documenting, I have added comments to several issues i have opened in
the upstream project.  Generally this project assumes it is built from the amd
rpms and has a lot of rough edges the older rocm projects have smoothed off. 
So I feel the main problem is the upstream needs to try to build on a second
install location and they will understand and fix their problems.

This issue is an example of that
https://github.com/ROCm/MIOpen/issues/2734


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261201

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202261201%23c5
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux