[Bug 2261201] Review Request: miopen - AMD's Machine Intelligence Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261201

Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Yay, public domain fun times. As near as I can tell, the text of the license
blerb in src/md5.cpp needs to be filed with other public domain blerbs.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/#_public_domain

That being said, I'm a little unclear on if the file is still public domain
since it has been modified from the original but the license header for the
file isn't changed so it probably still is?

The big thing I'm seeing is the pre-compiled kernels that are in the -devel
package (/usr/share/miopen/db). Was that intentional? If so, doesn't that
violate packaging guidelines?

A few small-ish things:
 - shouldn't URL be https://github.com/ROCm/%{upstreamname} ?
 - shouldn't CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE  be RelWithDebInfo?
 - BuildRequires should be pkgconfig instead of explicit XXX-devel
 - please add notes for what those patches are for and if they're intended to
be long-term vs. temporary
   * especially in 0001-prepare-miopen-for-fedora.patch; I think I know what
those bits are for but I'm not sure

What is the purpose of compiler/linker patch and math to specify the number of
compile and link jobs? I tried removing it and it builds without issue, is it a
speedup?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2261201

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202261201%23c2
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux