[Bug 2257727] Review Request: gnome-ponytail-daemon - A helper daemon intended for dogtail on Wayland

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257727



--- Comment #10 from José Expósito <jexposit@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Jiri,

Thanks a lot for your review, I truly appreciate it.

(In reply to Jiri Konecny from comment #9)
> Hi Jose,
> 
> a few points from the Python part.
> 
> You should rename the package because Python guidelines requires naming in
> form of python3-* instead of python postfix:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_naming
> 
> To solve this you can do ``%files -n python3-gnome-ponytail-daemon`` and use
> `-n` on other cases too.

Solved, thanks! The generated RPM now is
"python3-gnome-ponytail-daemon-0.0.10-1.fc39.noarch.rpm".

> And you also need to add BuildRequires: python3-devel:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> #_buildrequire_python3_devel

This one is already included, but using the "python3_pkgversion" macro:

    BuildRequires:  python%{python3_pkgversion}-devel

I have seen this definition in other packages, for example:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vulkan-tools/blob/rawhide/f/vulkan-tools.spec#_15

> Also you shouldn't have dependency on python3 instead the recommendation is:
> 
> ```
> Packages SHOULD NOT have an explicit runtime dependency on python3.
> 
> Instead of depending on python3, packages have an automatic dependency on
> python(abi) = 3.X when they install files to %{python3_sitelib} or
> %{python3_sitearch}, or they have an automatic dependency on
> /usr/bin/python3 if they have executable Python scripts, or they have an
> automatic dependency on libpython3.X.so.1.0() if they embed Python.
> ```
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> #_dependencies

Good point, I removed the "Requires: python3".

Also, even the documentation suggest that informing upstream is the only
required action for the "incorrect-fsf-address" lint error, since my patch has
been already merged, I included it in the package.

Queuing a new build with your suggested changes.
Thanks again for the review!!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257727

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202257727%23c10
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux