Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-18 00:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > The JBoss documentation uses the above license. The xml & images in this package > > is embedded in the books at build time. > > Potentially, content from a fully-free usage of a CC license might be blendable > with non-free CC licenses. So maybe if this package was licenced CC then CC(+ all those letters) might be able to use it? > Regardless, the copyright owner can choose to dual-license. Is that Red Hat? > > > I need a license that allows the xml and images to be used in Creative Commons > > Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike books. > > As in bz #427483, the original copyright holder can choose to dual-license. The > NC clause is a restriction of a freedom, making that particular CC license > non-free, and therefore not allowed in Fedora. I'll make someone talk to the lawyers and see how to liecnse this package so it can fit in to Fedora and allow the JBoss folk to use it in there docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review