Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 kwade@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kwade@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-17 23:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The main goal here is to allow JBoss writers, developers, and the _extensive_ > JBoss community to use Fedora as their main work environment for documentation. I'm not sure what you mean by this point? They can choose to use a non-free license if they wish, although I'm don't initially see how the NC helps when it comes to taking community content into formal, Red Hat-produced JBoss (i.e., commercial) documentation. > The JBoss documentation uses the above license. The xml & images in this package > is embedded in the books at build time. Potentially, content from a fully-free usage of a CC license might be blendable with non-free CC licenses. Regardless, the copyright owner can choose to dual-license. Is that Red Hat? > I need a license that allows the xml and images to be used in Creative Commons > Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike books. As in bz #427483, the original copyright holder can choose to dual-license. The NC clause is a restriction of a freedom, making that particular CC license non-free, and therefore not allowed in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review