https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229349 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Junghans <junghans@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho from comment #15) > By the way, I believe the previous comment should point to the SRPM at > https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/lfortran-0.30.0-2.fc40.src.rpm Sorry, my bad, thanks for catching that. > > > ExclusiveArch: x86_64 > > AFAICS, lfortran does support aarch64. Any reasons to restrict to x86_64? Yes, right now there is a bug in the complex number of aarch64, see: https://github.com/lfortran/lfortran/issues/2981, hence I would like to wait until the next release to enable aarch64 (and ppc64le) > > Besides that, should WITH_TARGET_AARCH64 and WITH_TARGET_WASM also be > enabled in all builds? > This is what I'm seeing right now: > WITH_TARGET_AARCH64: no > WITH_TARGET_X86: yes > WITH_TARGET_WASM: no Let me take care of that! > > > BuildRequires: llvm16-devel > > Does lfortran support LLVM 17? > If it does, I suggest to move to this version. It is in the making: https://github.com/lfortran/lfortran/issues/2916, but it will take a little more work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229349 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202229349%23c16 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
