https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247350 --- Comment #27 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I think there are 2 issues here related to the vendoring business. (with the caveat that I'm a complete rust n00b, and know very little about how Fedora is approaching it.) The first issue is the forked bindgen; for now, there is no way around that I think. Packaging the forked version w/ bcachefs-tools seems to be the straightforward solution for now. The second issue is all the other crate dependencies. I *think* Fedora prefers to have those crates packaged as separate RPMs, and in fact some of them (or all of them? I haven't looked) already are. I was not able to sort out how to get the bcachefs-tools RPM build to use them, but somebody in Fedora-land must know. Kent has expressed displeasure at the idea of using separately packaged crates for the build, but the truth is if it's an OS packaging policy, there's not a lot upstream can do about that. (Conversation and input, sure, but in the end, the OS will have a policy that upstream may or may not agree with.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247350 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247350%23c27 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
