https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 --- Comment #86 from xiangquan.liu@xxxxxxxxx --- (In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #83) > > We also don't end up needing any of the pre-built libraries that the sgxsdk > tarball bundles AFAICT, since we can replace the pre-built crypto with > sgxssl + openssl. > > Building this way resulted in two extra libraries libtdx_tls.a and > libsgx_mbedcrypto.a that sgxsdk tarball was missing. I don't know if > they're desirable or not ? These 2 libraries should be included. > Also the libsgtcxx.a library is called libsgx_tcxx.a. sgxsdk seemed to take > special action to rename it to libsgtcxx.a for some reason. Again I don't > know if that's desirable or not ?: libsgtcxx.a is a invalid library here and we can remove it. > The %{_includedir}/sgxsdk/mbedtls/ files got installed, which was not the > case with sgxsdk package too. Right. We need to put mbedtls into include folder. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202085444%23c86 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
