[Bug 2085444] Review Request: sgx-sdk - Software Guard eXtension software development kit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444



--- Comment #84 from Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #83)
> Please take a look at my RPM proposal and let me know what you think about
> this approach of building from upstream source instead of the current sgxsdk
> source tarball. AFAICT, there should be no semantic difference between the
> two approaches, except for my decision to use sgxssl and no prebuilt ipp
> crypto
Your idea and the proposal of building RPMs from upstream source makes perfect
sense. It's more clean and straight forward.
Thanks a lot for the updated spec, which built fine on koji along with the srpm
you shared: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108501412

For the two choices of separated spec or single linux-sgx.spec for both sdk &
aesm-service, we don't have any preferences. Which option do you recommend?
The aesm-service RPMs build depends on sdk. Will it work with a single unified
linux-sgx.spec to build everything?

Regarding to the sgxssl instead of prebuilt ipp crypto, the missing or renamed
libs are needed or not, @xiangquan could you check and comment?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202085444%23c84
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux