https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243260 --- Comment #6 from Erico Nunes <ernunes@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Pavol Zacik from comment #5) > - Have you tried building mesa-demos with the newest version? The glvnd > patch has already been included upstream > since 1.0.6. [1] so it would be nicer to ship the most recent version > without the downstream patch. > There have also been very few commits since 1.0.4, and they do not seem > very breaking to me, judging by their > commit messages. I did not spend much time trying to do that and figure out about the version bump so far. As I mentioned in comment #0, my proposal is to solve the package split first by having it exactly as it was on mesa-demos as a reference starting point and then solve the version bump and downstream patch cleanup in a followup commit. > - I would use the %{_mandir} macro instead of %{_datadir}/man. Makes sense, I will update that. Thank you for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243260 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243260%23c6 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
