https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243345 --- Comment #5 from Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the reply! Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~walters/bootc.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~walters/bootc-0.1.1-1.fc40.src.rpm > PS: Do you have a list of the crates are currently missing from Fedora, preventing this package from being built without vendored dependencies? Biggest is kube, a dependency which I am really debating because it's kind of massive overkill for what we need right now. Though either way as you know it's important to me to keep this spec in sync with C9S. > (On second glance, it looks like this was adapted from the rust-bootupd package, which explains the unusual structure and issues with duplicate License / Summary tags. Yes indeed. Fixed those thanks! > Pointing rust2rpm at bootc-0.1.1/Cargo.toml should actually give you better results than that. :) It's a bit messier than that as it's split into sub-crates *internally* but I don't want to publish those to crates.io; looks like `cargo package` wants that. I'm sure I could fake it out but...mmm, dunno. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243345 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202243345%23c5 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
