https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219159 Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ Status|NEW |POST CC| |klember@xxxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |klember@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Fedora review libgedit-gtksourceview-299.0.4-1.fc40.src.rpm 2023-08-18 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm =================================================================================== rpmlint session starts =================================================================================== rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 5 libgedit-gtksourceview.src: W: strange-permission libgedit-gtksourceview.spec 600 ==================================================== 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.8 s ==================================================== + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output looks good + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The license text (LGPL) is included in %license + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm SHA512 (libgedit-gtksourceview-299.0.4.tar.xz) = cf264620cbe621b51ac22ce9943b1e5517ac7a4d4300d383f4e24664a757fc98e3d339c07a5e6282247d93ea606eafa5346907516d838aec38aaa301fd18d91e SHA512 (Download/libgedit-gtksourceview-299.0.4.tar.xz) = cf264620cbe621b51ac22ce9943b1e5517ac7a4d4300d383f4e24664a757fc98e3d339c07a5e6282247d93ea606eafa5346907516d838aec38aaa301fd18d91e + Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + locale handling + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all the directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Development files should be in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Proper .desktop file handling + Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + Filenames are valid UTF-8 + Package does not depend on deprecated packages APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219159 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219159%23c5 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
