[Bug 2224783] Review Request: dragonbox - Reference implementation of Dragonbox in C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224783



--- Comment #4 from Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Felix Wang from comment #3)
> I only see an issue: static library should be avoided as possible. The
> remaining things LGTM.

This is a header only library, so adheres to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

BTW, if you're willing to make a formal review, you should set the ticket
status to ASSIGNED and set yourself as the assignee.
Thanks.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224783

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202224783%23c4
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux