[Bug 2212222] Review Request: tuigreet - Graphical console greeter for greetd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212222



--- Comment #2 from Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #1)
> Some minor issues:
> 
> 1. The upstream license seems to be GPL-3.0-or-later, not GPL-3.0-only (see
> help text output at the bottom of "src/greeter.rs") - yes, it would be good
> if upstream had this in the Cargo.toml metadata (i.e. [package] license =
> "GPL-3.0-or-later").

https://github.com/apognu/tuigreet/commit/2832dac71f1f7faca6b7c94e10f5f8bf7f1f2819
made me believe that it uses the same license as greetd (which is GPL-3.0-only
as confirmed by the greetd upstream). GPL-3.0 from Cargo metadata is also a
deprecated identifier for GPL-3.0-only. And upstream developer's own packages
on AUR list the license as GPL3.
I'm going to assume -only for this review and file an issue with clarification
request.

> 2. Why is the version of the tarball 0.8.0 but the one in the Cargo metadata
> is 0.7.3? Did upstream tag a new version without bumping the version in
> metadata?

Yes, that's exactly what happened. Easy to miss when you don't publish to
crates.io.

> There is no rationale for the patch other than "fix crate version".

It fixes `tuigreet --version` output. No other reason :(

> 3. Remove "ExclusiveArch:  %{rust_arches}". It is a noop that is no longer
> needed, and it is no longer mandated by the Packaging Guidelines.

Thanks for catching, will fix.
This spec was made long time ago, seems like I failed to update everything
according to the current guidelines.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212222

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202212222%23c2
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux