https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551 --- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #21) > Sorry, but a wrong license tag certainly is a blocking issue. I don't see where I said that it wasn't a blocking issue. I said I was still working on it. > At the very least, the spec file will need to contain > - a list of the licenses of all dependencies that get statically linked into > shipped binaries, and > - the resulting License tag (i.e. SPDX expression resulting from AND-ing > them all together) > > You've already included RPM macros that don't work in RHEL in the spec file > (i.e. %cargo_license_summary and %cargo_license) - so I don't understand why > copying the output of %cargo_license_summary from the build log into the > spec file and AND-ing everything together to form the value of the License > tag is an additional problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
