[Bug 2133551] Review Request: fido-device-onboard - A rust implementation of the FIDO Device Onboard Specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551



--- Comment #21 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Sorry, but a wrong license tag certainly is a blocking issue.

At the very least, the spec file will need to contain
- a list of the licenses of all dependencies that get statically linked into
shipped binaries, and
- the resulting License tag (i.e. SPDX expression resulting from AND-ing them
all together)

You've already included RPM macros that don't work in RHEL in the spec file
(i.e. %cargo_license_summary and %cargo_license) - so I don't understand why
copying the output of %cargo_license_summary from the build log into the spec
file and AND-ing everything together to form the value of the License tag is an
additional problem?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133551
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux