https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196598 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Would it make more sense to review new packages for OLD versions for backward compatibility, maybe shipping just limited set of libraries with different ABI? And to update original gpsd package to recent version, matching its own version in Fedora rawhide? The new package could provide just minimal support to work with older clients relying on old ABI. I think using gpsd<version> is more common than -latest suffix. I expect we usually have packages without version with the more recent version and only backward compatibility include version. At least it were this way with openssl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196598 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
